Thursday 2 June 2011

Bee Season brings out spelling reformers

Spelling reformers in the 21st century facing the same problems spelling reformers always have done. A2s will recognise the arguments. 

This article fails to mention Webster, who represents an important exception to its claim that spelling reformers are always ineffectual. Is Webster so fundamental for American observers that he's beneath notice?  Or has the article writer dun goof'd?